Search for: "Direct Line Transportation LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 2:47 am
February 7, 2019 - 11 AM: In re Central Dynamics, LLC, Serial No. 86906610, 86906682, and 86862221 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals of ECONCIERGE (standard characters) for “Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for hotels, resorts, casinos, hospitality and transportation providers to communicate with and support guests before, during and after stays regarding preferences, profiles, planning and management of stays, dining,… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
The Debtors also filed the declaration of Amy Lee (the “Lee Declaration”) (Doc. 5), a senior director at Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC (“Alvarez”), the financial advisor to the Debtors. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:42 am
The Board’s decision represents a stricter interpretation of the law regarding the General Counsel’s burden of proof under the Wright Line analysis; one cannot help but wonder how long this application of the Wright Line analysis will last with the upcoming change in administration. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
The court also found that the employee was “responsible for directing and overseeing all operators and truck drivers. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
Further questions may be directed to Executive Assistant U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:45 pm
-"work line" / "protect line" means "[a] line of a ring over which traffic is transported when there is no interruption in the ring." / "A line of a ring allocated to transport the traffic in the event the work line of the ring becomes unavailable due to an interruption in the ring." [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:28 pm
See Tiger Lily, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:21 am
Strategic Delivery Solutions, LLC, Case No. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Tricor Energy is an independent energy company that produces, transports, and sells natural gas and oil from its fields in California. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:33 am
In Saxon, the Court held that section 1 applies to airline workers who load and unload cargo planes, and observed that the critical question when analyzing the applicability of the exemption was whether the workers actively engage in the transportation of goods in interstate commerce and whether they play a “direct and necessary role in the free flow of goods across borders. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Over on the Howell and Christmas, LLC Child Injury Lawyer Blog your attorneys in Charleston posted an entry that gave some quick tips for parents to help prevent child injuries while there out Trick-or-Treating this Halloween. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:30 am
No matter where you are in the state, we can point you in the right direction regarding all of your DMV needs. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 1:06 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014) (“Iskanian”) for some time. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:25 pm
Department of Transportation, has historically written the rules for vehicle safety in the U.S., such as crash test requirements and quality control issues for car manufacturers. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:25 pm
Department of Transportation, has historically written the rules for vehicle safety in the U.S., such as crash test requirements and quality control issues for car manufacturers. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
The Bottom Line: The Ninth Circuit has rejected, at least on one set of facts, the application of FAAA Act preemption to California’s meal and rest period requirements in the transportation industry, but a better developed factual record might lead to a different conclusion. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION LAW DOES NOT PREEMPT CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR TEST. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
The driver of the pickup truck and his passenger were transported to a local hospital for treatment of non-life threatening injuries. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm
” The Fourth Circuit held that the UPS policy providing light-duty work only to employees who had on-the-job injuries, employees with disabilities accommodated under the ADA, and employees who had lost Department of Transportation (DOT) certification was not direct evidence of pregnancy-based sex discrimination. [read post]
